Mots-clé
(Allemand)
|
Armenia, rural development, agriculture, markets for poor, value chains, horticulture
|
Mots-clé
(Anglais)
|
Armenia, rural development, agriculture, markets for poor, value chains, horticulture
|
Mots-clé
(Français)
|
Armenia, rural development, agriculture, markets for poor, value chains, horticulture
|
Mots-clé
(Italien)
|
Armenia, rural development, agriculture, markets for poor, value chains, horticulture
|
Description succincte
(Allemand)
|
This review is to appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners, the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities, and to draw lessons and provide recommendations for the following phase (07/2014 – 12/2016).In spring 2014, a mid-term review – the present one – should assess the situation and make recommendations for the second sub-phase (7/2014 to 12/2016).According the Terms of Reference, this review is toa) appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners,b) appraise the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities,c) draw lessons concerning the project context and the M4P approach, andd) provide recommendations as to (1) the management structure and responsibilities between CARD and HSI, and (2) the main emphasis within the M4P approach in relation to stakeholders and actors.
Documents annexés
|
Description succincte
(Anglais)
|
This review is to appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners, the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities, and to draw lessons and provide recommendations for the following phase (07/2014 – 12/2016).In spring 2014, a mid-term review – the present one – should assess the situation and make recommendations for the second sub-phase (7/2014 to 12/2016).According the Terms of Reference, this review is toa) appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners,b) appraise the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities,c) draw lessons concerning the project context and the M4P approach, andd) provide recommendations as to (1) the management structure and responsibilities between CARD and HSI, and (2) the main emphasis within the M4P approach in relation to stakeholders and actors.
Documents annexés
|
Description succincte
(Français)
|
This review is to appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners, the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities, and to draw lessons and provide recommendations for the following phase (07/2014 – 12/2016).In spring 2014, a mid-term review – the present one – should assess the situation and make recommendations for the second sub-phase (7/2014 to 12/2016).According the Terms of Reference, this review is toa) appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners,b) appraise the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities,c) draw lessons concerning the project context and the M4P approach, andd) provide recommendations as to (1) the management structure and responsibilities between CARD and HSI, and (2) the main emphasis within the M4P approach in relation to stakeholders and actors.
Documents annexés
|
Description succincte
(Italien)
|
This review is to appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners, the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities, and to draw lessons and provide recommendations for the following phase (07/2014 – 12/2016).In spring 2014, a mid-term review – the present one – should assess the situation and make recommendations for the second sub-phase (7/2014 to 12/2016).According the Terms of Reference, this review is toa) appraise the implementation set-up and capacities of partners,b) appraise the effectiveness of the project, the relevance of its approaches and the sustainability of its activities,c) draw lessons concerning the project context and the M4P approach, andd) provide recommendations as to (1) the management structure and responsibilities between CARD and HSI, and (2) the main emphasis within the M4P approach in relation to stakeholders and actors.
Documents annexés
|
Mandataire
(Anglais)
|
Markus Reichmuth / Sergey Matevosyan
|
Budget imputé
(Anglais)
|
SDC / DEZA / DDC / DSC / COSUDE
|
Bases légales
(Anglais)
|
Art. 57 Abs. 1 RVOG Art. 57 al. 1 LOGA Art. 57 cpv. 1 LOGA
|
Droits d'auteur
(Anglais)
|
Copyright, Bundesbehörden der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft | Droits d'auteur: autorités de la Confédération suisse | Diritti d'autore: autorità della Confederazione Svizzera | Dretgs d'autur: autoritads da la Confederaziun svizra | Copyright, Swiss federal authorities
|
Renseignements
(Anglais)
|
SDC Eurasia Division+41 (0)58 462 44 14eurad_oza@eda.admin.ch
|
