Schlüsselwörter
(Deutsch)
|
Macedonia, civil society, CSOs, civic action, grants
|
Schlüsselwörter
(Englisch)
|
Macedonia, civil society, CSOs, civic action, grants
|
Schlüsselwörter
(Französisch)
|
Macedonia, civil society, CSOs, civic action, grants
|
Schlüsselwörter
(Italienisch)
|
Macedonia, civil society, CSOs, civic action, grants
|
Kurzbeschreibung
(Deutsch)
|
he Civica Mobilitas programme started in 2009 and aims to strengthen the capacity and sustainability of CSOs in Macedonia. It is widely appreciated among grantees, government and SDC’s donor peers, especially in these times of shrinking bilateral funding and the consolidation of aid funds into European Commission funding which will soon be channelled through government. Civica awards project and institutional grants and has supported a loosely-designed series of debates among CSOs. The SDC-supported community Forums programme is widely admired as a successful way to create interfaces between CSOs and local government. There is value in developing further this generally successful model, by way of a process of critical reflection in which its imperfections are also addressed. Until now the second component of Civica has been loosely designed and has not had a strategic result. Tensions around how to engage such different actors as national-level Skopje-based large CSOs and small, locally-based ones, resulted in a low common denominator and limited interest, and no follow-up to debates took place. We recommend that SDC focuses on supporting CSOs that explicitly seek to be or become social change agents. We recommend that Civica Phase 2 invites CSOs to join a collective, structured, 3-4 year process of self-aware reflection and learning about civil society identity, values, principles, constituencies and theories of change, with a view to articulating these aspects of their own organisations better. We call this programme ‘Developing Roo
Zugehörige Dokumente
|
Kurzbeschreibung
(Englisch)
|
he Civica Mobilitas programme started in 2009 and aims to strengthen the capacity and sustainability of CSOs in Macedonia. It is widely appreciated among grantees, government and SDC’s donor peers, especially in these times of shrinking bilateral funding and the consolidation of aid funds into European Commission funding which will soon be channelled through government. Civica awards project and institutional grants and has supported a loosely-designed series of debates among CSOs. The SDC-supported community Forums programme is widely admired as a successful way to create interfaces between CSOs and local government. There is value in developing further this generally successful model, by way of a process of critical reflection in which its imperfections are also addressed. Until now the second component of Civica has been loosely designed and has not had a strategic result. Tensions around how to engage such different actors as national-level Skopje-based large CSOs and small, locally-based ones, resulted in a low common denominator and limited interest, and no follow-up to debates took place. We recommend that SDC focuses on supporting CSOs that explicitly seek to be or become social change agents. We recommend that Civica Phase 2 invites CSOs to join a collective, structured, 3-4 year process of self-aware reflection and learning about civil society identity, values, principles, constituencies and theories of change, with a view to articulating these aspects of their own organisations better. We call this programme ‘Developing Roo
Zugehörige Dokumente
|
Kurzbeschreibung
(Französisch)
|
he Civica Mobilitas programme started in 2009 and aims to strengthen the capacity and sustainability of CSOs in Macedonia. It is widely appreciated among grantees, government and SDC’s donor peers, especially in these times of shrinking bilateral funding and the consolidation of aid funds into European Commission funding which will soon be channelled through government. Civica awards project and institutional grants and has supported a loosely-designed series of debates among CSOs. The SDC-supported community Forums programme is widely admired as a successful way to create interfaces between CSOs and local government. There is value in developing further this generally successful model, by way of a process of critical reflection in which its imperfections are also addressed. Until now the second component of Civica has been loosely designed and has not had a strategic result. Tensions around how to engage such different actors as national-level Skopje-based large CSOs and small, locally-based ones, resulted in a low common denominator and limited interest, and no follow-up to debates took place. We recommend that SDC focuses on supporting CSOs that explicitly seek to be or become social change agents. We recommend that Civica Phase 2 invites CSOs to join a collective, structured, 3-4 year process of self-aware reflection and learning about civil society identity, values, principles, constituencies and theories of change, with a view to articulating these aspects of their own organisations better. We call this programme ‘Developing Roo
Zugehörige Dokumente
|
Kurzbeschreibung
(Italienisch)
|
he Civica Mobilitas programme started in 2009 and aims to strengthen the capacity and sustainability of CSOs in Macedonia. It is widely appreciated among grantees, government and SDC’s donor peers, especially in these times of shrinking bilateral funding and the consolidation of aid funds into European Commission funding which will soon be channelled through government. Civica awards project and institutional grants and has supported a loosely-designed series of debates among CSOs. The SDC-supported community Forums programme is widely admired as a successful way to create interfaces between CSOs and local government. There is value in developing further this generally successful model, by way of a process of critical reflection in which its imperfections are also addressed. Until now the second component of Civica has been loosely designed and has not had a strategic result. Tensions around how to engage such different actors as national-level Skopje-based large CSOs and small, locally-based ones, resulted in a low common denominator and limited interest, and no follow-up to debates took place. We recommend that SDC focuses on supporting CSOs that explicitly seek to be or become social change agents. We recommend that Civica Phase 2 invites CSOs to join a collective, structured, 3-4 year process of self-aware reflection and learning about civil society identity, values, principles, constituencies and theories of change, with a view to articulating these aspects of their own organisations better. We call this programme ‘Developing Roo
Zugehörige Dokumente
|
Auftragnehmer
(Englisch)
|
Rosie McGee (IDS), Patta Scott-Villiers (IDS), Besim Nebiu
|
Belastetes Budget
(Englisch)
|
SDC / DEZA / DDC / DSC / COSUDE
|
Gesetzliche Grundlage
(Englisch)
|
Art. 57 Abs. 1 RVOG Art. 57 al. 1 LOGA Art. 57 cpv. 1 LOGAArtikel 170 der Bundesverfassung zur WirksamkeitsüberprüfungArticle 170 de la Constitution fédérale relatif à l’évaluation de l’efficacitéArticolo 170 della Costituzione federale sulla verifica dell‘efficaciaArticle 170 of the Swiss Federal Constitution on the evaluation of effectiveness
|
Impressum
(Englisch)
|
Copyright, Bundesbehörden der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft | Droits d'auteur: autorités de la Confédération suisse | Diritti d'autore: autorità della Confederazione Svizzera | Dretgs d'autur: autoritads da la Confederaziun svizra | Copyright, Swiss federal authorities
|
Auskunft
(Englisch)
|
Swiss Cooperation Office in Macedonia
|
