Mots-clé
(Allemand)
|
Serbia, private sector development, making markets work for the poor, employment, income generation, tourism, fruit production and processing, meat and diary
|
Mots-clé
(Anglais)
|
Serbia, private sector development, making markets work for the poor, employment, income generation, tourism, fruit production and processing, meat and diary
|
Mots-clé
(Français)
|
Serbia, private sector development, making markets work for the poor, employment, income generation, tourism, fruit production and processing, meat and diary
|
Mots-clé
(Italien)
|
Serbia, private sector development, making markets work for the poor, employment, income generation, tourism, fruit production and processing, meat and diary
|
Description succincte
(Allemand)
|
ant delays in implementation, mainly due to the approach being new and the heavy demands made by the research and analysis. Three sectors have been selected and analysed: tourism, fruit production and processing, and meat and dairy. Two interventions in tourism are well underway while two are in the start-up phase. Interventions in fruit are under preparation, while those for meat and dairy still have to be designed. Progress on building the capacity of the RDA to use the M4P approach is good.The objectives of the review were to: 1) Assess the relevance of the project’s approaches in the given development/transition context; 2) Assess the appropriateness of the implementation set-up, including backstopping, with regard to a proper understanding of the facilitator role, the proper handling of M4P analytical frameworks and corresponding intervention strategies and the perception of the implementer by relevant stakeholders (public and private market players; 3) Assess the likelihood of significant scale, employment and income generation of the project interventions; 4) Provide recommendations on the 3 dimensions mentioned above for the remainder of the current and the following phase.
Documents annexés
|
Description succincte
(Anglais)
|
The objectives of the review were to: 1) Assess the relevance of the project’s approaches in the given development/transition context; 2) Assess the appropriateness of the implementation set-up, including backstopping, with regard to a proper understanding of the facilitator role, the proper handling of M4P analytical frameworks and corresponding intervention strategies and the perception of the implementer by relevant stakeholders (public and private market players; 3) Assess the likelihood of significant scale, employment and income generation of the project interventions; 4) Provide recommendations on the 3 dimensions mentioned above for the remainder of the current and the following phase.
Documents annexés
|
Description succincte
(Français)
|
The objectives of the review were to: 1) Assess the relevance of the project’s approaches in the given development/transition context; 2) Assess the appropriateness of the implementation set-up, including backstopping, with regard to a proper understanding of the facilitator role, the proper handling of M4P analytical frameworks and corresponding intervention strategies and the perception of the implementer by relevant stakeholders (public and private market players; 3) Assess the likelihood of significant scale, employment and income generation of the project interventions; 4) Provide recommendations on the 3 dimensions mentioned above for the remainder of the current and the following phase.
Documents annexés
|
Description succincte
(Italien)
|
The objectives of the review were to: 1) Assess the relevance of the project’s approaches in the given development/transition context; 2) Assess the appropriateness of the implementation set-up, including backstopping, with regard to a proper understanding of the facilitator role, the proper handling of M4P analytical frameworks and corresponding intervention strategies and the perception of the implementer by relevant stakeholders (public and private market players; 3) Assess the likelihood of significant scale, employment and income generation of the project interventions; 4) Provide recommendations on the 3 dimensions mentioned above for the remainder of the current and the following phase.
Documents annexés
|
Mandataire
(Anglais)
|
Roel Hakemulder, Mladen Momcilovic
|
Budget imputé
(Anglais)
|
SDC / DEZA / DDC / DSC
|
Bases légales
(Anglais)
|
Art. 170 BV
|
Droits d'auteur
(Anglais)
|
Copyright, Bundesbehörden der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft | Droits d'auteur: autorités de la Confédération suisse | Diritti d'autore: autorità della Confederazione Svizzera | Dretgs d'autur: autoritads da la Confederaziun svizra | Copyright, Swiss federal authorities
|
Renseignements
(Anglais)
|
Swiss Cooperation Office in Serbia
|
