In theory, improving animal health and welfare reduces environmental impacts through decreased medicine use, improved growth rates and feed conversion efficiency.
In organic pig production, health and welfare improvements must be implemented through preventive approaches, optimal disease management and innovative systems regarding outdoor areas. Organic regulations, different national animal welfare regulations and different building traditions have led to the development of a variety of management strategies across the EU. This diversity offers a great potential to develop improvement strategies, since best practices can act as role models.
The key objectives of the project were to investigate the interaction of animal health and welfare with environmental impact, to identify best practice and to create tools for farmers to improve health, welfare, nutrition, management and environmental impact of organic pigs.
At the beginning of the project husbandry systems were defined (outdoor / partly outdoor / indoor with concrete outside run). A survey on about 25 organic farms of each system across eight different European countries was conducted. Environmental impacts were assessed using Life Cycle Assessment and calculations of nutrient balances. Animal health and welfare were evaluated from clinical scoring and selected behavioral parameters. Results were fed back to farmers as benchmarking reports, based on which the farmer chose farm specific goals and strategies to achieve these. Thus, all farms created their individual health, welfare and environmental plan, which was reviewed after one year to allow continuous development.
The effect of farming systems on health, welfare and environmental impact were assessed with multivariate models, taking into account the climatic conditions. The farm specific strategies were evaluated by assessing within-farm improvement in measured criteria over 12 months.
Results indicated that most organic pig farms across Europe did encompass low environmental impacts and good animal health and welfare. The three main husbandry systems did not differ regarding greenhouse warming potential or total Nitrogen balances, but indoor systems were significantly better regarding P balances. Partially outdoor systems were better than indoor systems regarding acidification, and regarding eutrophication indoor systems were better than outdoor systems. The variation between the stages of rearing within the management systems was greater than the variation between systems. The consequences for environmental impact require a longer term assessment to take account of the delay in outcomes and seasonal influences.
Regarding animal health and welfare, outdoor systems had advantages, whereas indoor systems performed better regarding fattener productivity.
Concerning farm specific improvement strategies, 81.6 % of the goals set by farmers were partly or completely achieved.