ServicenavigationHauptnavigationTrailKarteikarten


Research unit
TPH
Project number
8.12
Project title
Extensive Production Systems in Semi-Arid Regions – Options for Sustainable Future Livelihoods (TPP 6; NCCR North South)

Texts for this project

 GermanFrenchItalianEnglish
Short description
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Project aims
-
-
-
Anzeigen

Inserted texts


CategoryText
Short description
(English)

Extensive production systems (EPS) are effective land use systems which allow using scarce natural resources in vast rural semi-arid and highland-lowland areas in a sustainable way by various societies. However, the societal and economic role of EPS is frequently underestimated if not overlooked, particularly at national political level. Ranging from pastoralism (sedentary and mobile) to alternative land uses (e.g. agro-sylvo-pastoralism), which secure the livelihoods of millions of rural peoples; the diversity of adaptation is remarkable. Over the last decades rapid and major socio-political, economic, cultural, institutional, and ecologic changes have put heavy and unprecedented pressures on many EPS. Considering their economic and political marginalisation, innovations are needed to motivate the younger generation to reconsider the EPS areas as a promising way of life and to convince policy makers to consider EPS as a potential capable to contribute to reduce migration towards urban centres.

Though the scientific literature regarding key features, potentials, and alternative land use systems is vast, few rigorous scientific comparative investigation related to implementation processes has been conducted so far. To fill this gap, such research should (i) link sociological, ecological, and economic perspectives, (ii) follow an inter- and trans-disciplinary approach grounded in regional partnerships, and (iii) compare and capitalize experiences gained in different geographical contexts. Moreover, the current situation should be reassessed by applying modern technologies while developing and promoting simple but well standardised and adapted (impact) monitoring protocols.

The research gap identified and intended to be addressed corresponds to two major strengths of the NCCR, which are (i) a strong focus on inter- and trans-disciplinary research and learning processes, and (ii) the opportunity to compare potentials, options, and best practices in the different JACS regions. The TPP is designed to build on these strengths in order to make a genuine contribution to research on EPS. Moreover, it draws upon a systemic approach allowing tackling the complexity of the issue. Two entry points for the selection and implementation of promising alternatives and options are proposed: (i) access to social services and (ii) sustainable natural resource management. These two entry points are chosen according to the existing research priorities in the JACS WAF and CAS. This will allow extending the current achievements in the different regions by broadening the perspective towards a more comprehensive understanding of implementation, e.g. of novel land use arrangements (pastoral code, new collective institutions) or adapted social and economic services (e.g. joint animal and human vaccinations, commodity chains).

The project has the following three objectives:

i)  to assess, characterise, and compare various institutional changes in the JACS WAF and CAS with a special focus on pattern of problems, potential and processes of global and regional change;

ii) to assess impact monitoring with special focus on interventions and best practices combining a participatory and a systemic approach; and

iii) to assess, test, and validate determinants of successful implementation (conflict mitigation, equity promotion, improved access) based on concrete selected interventions while going to scale.

The TPP will produce the following innovative outputs:

i) A comprehensive institutional framework and its implication on natural resource management, access to social services and conflict mitigation.

ii) Allow for a cross fertilizing institutional learning process between the two JACS

iii) Provide a new methodological tool to combine impact assessment of natural resource management and health

iv) Well established and in some areas new relationships between the directly concerned populations and the responsible authorities allowing for improved up-scaling (from local to national programme in Chad) interventions on sustainable natural resource management and social services.

Project aims
(English)

The project has the following three objectives:

i) to assess, characterise, and compare various institutional changes in the JACS WAF and CAS with a special focus on pattern of problems, potential and processes of global and regional change;

ii) to assess impact monitoring with special focus on interventions and best practices combining a participatory and a systemic approach; and

iii) to assess, test, and validate determinants of successful implementation (conflict mitigation, equity promotion, improved access) based on concrete selected interventions while going to scale.