ServicenavigationHauptnavigationTrailKarteikarten


Research unit
COST
Project number
C01.0040
Project title
Methods for assessing soil available phosphate in Europe

Texts for this project

 GermanFrenchItalianEnglish
Key words
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Research programs
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Short description
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Further information
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Partners and International Organizations
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Abstract
-
-
-
Anzeigen
References in databases
-
-
-
Anzeigen

Inserted texts


CategoryText
Key words
(English)
Soil phosphorus; availability
Research programs
(English)
COST-Action 832 - Agricultural contribution to Eutrophication
Short description
(English)
See abstract
Further information
(English)
Full name of research-institution/enterprise: Station fédérale de recherches en production végétale RAC
Partners and International Organizations
(English)
A, B, DK, FIN, F, D, GR, H, IRL, I, NL, N, PL, RO, E, S, CH, GB
Abstract
(English)
Each european country is using its own method for the determination of phosphorus availability to plants, together with an appropriate interpretation scheme of the P-status and fertilizer recommendations. In order to compare systems, a soil exchange program was organised: 16 P-methods were compared on 135 soils from 12 countries. The amount of extracted P decreased in the order Ptotal > Poxal. > PAL > PMe3 > PBray > PAAEDTA, PDL, PCAL > POlsen > Ppaper strip, PAAAc, PMorgan > PH2O, PCO2, PCaCl2. Isotopically exchangeable P was also measured. A large variability was observed in the results obtained by laboratories using the same method, thus demonstrating the great importance of an identical lab procedure as a prerequisite to any comparison. The traditional correlation/regression approach showed its limitations when applied to inhomogeneously distributed data and was replaced by more robust techniques that showed laboratory differential bias and confidence intervals of the log-transformed values. Even if all the methods reacted in the same way to growing amounts of added P in several trials, there were wide differences between results obtained with different methods. The interpretation schemes for P-status were also compared and revealed that about 50% of the tested soils were P-deficient. This last observation appears not to be in line with a generally high P fertilization during the last decades in Europe and should lead to a better evaluation of the plant-available soil phosphorus.
References in databases
(English)
Swiss Database: COST-DB of the State Secretariat for Education and Research Hallwylstrasse 4 CH-3003 Berne, Switzerland Tel. +41 31 322 74 82 Swiss Project-Number: C01.0040