ServicenavigationHauptnavigationTrailKarteikarten


Forschungsstelle
COST
Projektnummer
C01.0040
Projekttitel
Methods for assessing soil available phosphate in Europe
Projekttitel Englisch
Methods for assessing soil available phosphate in Europe

Texte zu diesem Projekt

 DeutschFranzösischItalienischEnglisch
Schlüsselwörter
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Forschungsprogramme
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Kurzbeschreibung
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Weitere Hinweise und Angaben
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Partner und Internationale Organisationen
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Abstract
-
-
-
Anzeigen
Datenbankreferenzen
-
-
-
Anzeigen

Erfasste Texte


KategorieText
Schlüsselwörter
(Englisch)
Soil phosphorus; availability
Forschungsprogramme
(Englisch)
COST-Action 832 - Agricultural contribution to Eutrophication
Kurzbeschreibung
(Englisch)
See abstract
Weitere Hinweise und Angaben
(Englisch)
Full name of research-institution/enterprise: Station fédérale de recherches en production végétale RAC
Partner und Internationale Organisationen
(Englisch)
A, B, DK, FIN, F, D, GR, H, IRL, I, NL, N, PL, RO, E, S, CH, GB
Abstract
(Englisch)
Each european country is using its own method for the determination of phosphorus availability to plants, together with an appropriate interpretation scheme of the P-status and fertilizer recommendations. In order to compare systems, a soil exchange program was organised: 16 P-methods were compared on 135 soils from 12 countries. The amount of extracted P decreased in the order Ptotal > Poxal. > PAL > PMe3 > PBray > PAAEDTA, PDL, PCAL > POlsen > Ppaper strip, PAAAc, PMorgan > PH2O, PCO2, PCaCl2. Isotopically exchangeable P was also measured. A large variability was observed in the results obtained by laboratories using the same method, thus demonstrating the great importance of an identical lab procedure as a prerequisite to any comparison. The traditional correlation/regression approach showed its limitations when applied to inhomogeneously distributed data and was replaced by more robust techniques that showed laboratory differential bias and confidence intervals of the log-transformed values. Even if all the methods reacted in the same way to growing amounts of added P in several trials, there were wide differences between results obtained with different methods. The interpretation schemes for P-status were also compared and revealed that about 50% of the tested soils were P-deficient. This last observation appears not to be in line with a generally high P fertilization during the last decades in Europe and should lead to a better evaluation of the plant-available soil phosphorus.
Datenbankreferenzen
(Englisch)
Swiss Database: COST-DB of the State Secretariat for Education and Research Hallwylstrasse 4 CH-3003 Berne, Switzerland Tel. +41 31 322 74 82 Swiss Project-Number: C01.0040